Luna v. Household Finance Corp. III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that one-page long arbitration agreement with terms in newspaper size typeface did not support a finding that the agreement was procedurally unconscionable
• holding that one-page-long arbitration agreement with terms in newspaper size typeface did not support a finding that the agreement was procedurally unconscionable
• holding that the plaintiff had failed to establish procedural unconscionability since he had a reasonable opportunity to consider the agreement and the arbitration clause was clearly set forth in the contract
• holding that the plaintiff had failed to establish procedural unconscionability since he had a reasonable opportunity to consider the agreement and the arbitration clause was clearly set forth in the contract
• noting that “under Washington law a contract may be invalidated on procedural unconscionability or substantive unconscionability grounds”
• noting that “under Washington law a contract may be invalidated on procedural unconscionability or substantive unconscionability grounds”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).