Luna v. Apfel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding 2154 VAN v. BARNHART Akopyan, although both parties had stipulated to a sentence- four remand order,8 we concluded that the claimant had the benefit of the entire 60-day appeal period in Rule 4(a), plus the 30-day period in § 2412(d)(1)(B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).