Lun Hua Chen v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendant’s conduct of spending more than $160,000 of the estate’s reserve “warrants] the conclusion that either she was aware of, or she willfully blinded herself to, the impropriety of her conduct”
• “The court must consider the debtor’s actual knowledge and circumstances (i.e., the subjective) and then decide whether the related conduct constituted a gross deviation from legal standards of conduct (i.e., the objective.”)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).