Skip to main content
· 5/7/2008

Lumsden Ex Rel. Estate of Lumsden v. United States

Citations

  • 555 F. Supp. 2d 580
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37719
  • 2008 WL 1987136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “[t]he ‘public duty’ doctrine has no application to an FTCA action” because “[w]hether or not state or local law enforcement officers would be liable under state law on the same or analogous facts is irrelevant” under the FTCA
  • ―The ‗public duty‘ doctrine has no application to an FTCA action‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James C. Fox

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.