· 5/7/2008
Lumsden Ex Rel. Estate of Lumsden v. United States
Citations
- 555 F. Supp. 2d 580
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37719
- 2008 WL 1987136
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “[t]he ‘public duty’ doctrine has no application to an FTCA action” because “[w]hether or not state or local law enforcement officers would be liable under state law on the same or analogous facts is irrelevant” under the FTCA
- ―The ‗public duty‘ doctrine has no application to an FTCA action‖
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: James C. Fox
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.