Lumpkins v. CSL LOCKSMITH, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reformation requires a factual finding of mutual mistake and proof by clear and convincing evidence
• noting that the presence of ambiguity in a contract is a question of law and that extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to prove the meaning of an unambiguous contractual term

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).