Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2/6/2004
Lumpkin v. State
Citations
- 129 S.W.3d 659
- 2004 WL 35942
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “pending” means that an event is “impending, or about to take place”
- holding that “pending” means that an event is “impending, or about to take place”
- holding that “pending” means that an event is “impending, or about to take place”
- holding that “pending” means that an event is “impending, or about to take place”
- determining that “pending” means “impending or about to take place”
- explaining that although “pending” and “in progress” appear synonymous based on one definition of “pending,” courts generally presume that “every word in a statute has been used for a purpose and that each word, phrase, clause, and sentence should be given effect if reasonably possible”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tim Taft
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.