Skip to main content
· 6/12/2008

Lumpkin v. Department of Family & Protective Services

Citations

  • 260 S.W.3d 524
  • 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 4300
  • 2008 WL 2388146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where trial court properly found appeal frivolous, no further review is warranted
  • explaining that frivolousness finding under section 263.405 is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard and that appellate court must consider frivolousness issue before proceeding to the merits of the appeal
  • noting that endangerment can be shown by acts and failures to act
  • noting that endangerment can be shown by acts and failures to act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Laura Carter Higley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.