Lummus v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declaring that an argument was proper in a DWI case when the prosecutor ―urged the jury to consider the seriousness of drunken driving because of the inherent danger arising therefrom, and the needless loss of life‖
• declaring that an argument was proper in a DWI case when the prosecutor “urged the jury to consider the seriousness of drunken driving because of the inherent danger arising therefrom, and the needless loss of life”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ward v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-11-23· cited 83×
• William Kyle Burton v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-03-29

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strahan v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1962-06-27· cited 19×
• Rodgers v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-10-21· cited 7×