· 11/23/1988
Lummus Industries, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. D.M. & E. Corporation, and MacHine Development Corporation, Appellants/cross-Appellees
Citations
- 862 F.2d 267
- 8 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1983
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15666
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying Fourth Circuit law to determine whether a party timely objected to a jury instruction
- there must be prejudice to the defendant and no reasonable excuse for the delay to limit or deny interest because of undue delay
- jury verdict of reconstruction for cutter wheels that were material part of patented invention
- limitation or denial of prejudgment interest because of plaintiffs undue delay in prosecuting his claim is the exception, not the rule; there must be prejudice to the defendant and no reasonable excuse for the unreasonable delay in order to limit or deny interest on this basis
- challenge to special verdict form
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nies, Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.