Skip to main content
· 6/14/2002

Lummus Global Amazonas, S.A. v. Aguaytia Energy Del Peru, S.R. Ltda.

Citations

  • 256 F. Supp. 2d 594
  • 2002 WL 31401996

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying discovery for alleged bias of arbitrator based on arbitrator’s former law partners’ representation of owner and investor in owner where record was adequate to permit court to determine the issue
  • “As a general rule, a final and definite arbitration award must both resolve all the issues submitted to arbitration, and determine each issue fully so that no further litigation is necessary to finalize the obligations of the parties under the award”
  • “As a general rule, a final and definite arbitration award must both resolve all the issues submitted to arbitration, and determine each issue fully so that no further litigation is necessary to finalize the obligations of the parties under the award”
  • “As a general rule, a final and definite arbitration award must both resolve all the issues 7 In this commercial arbitration case, we find the cited labor arbitration cases appropriate to the analysis. See Painewebber Inc. v. Elahi, 87 F.3d 589, 594 n.6 (1st Cir. 1996

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosenthal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.