Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff’s complaint “set forth a chronology of events from which retaliatory animus on the part of defendants could arguably be inferred” sufficient to overcome a motion to dismiss
• holding that the plaintiff’s complaint “set forth a chronology of events from which retaliatory animus on the part of defendants could arguably be inferred” sufficient to overcome a motion to dismiss
• “[A]lleging merely the ultimate fact of retaliation is insufficient.”
• “[A]lleging merely the ultimate fact of retaliation is insufficient.”
• “[A]lleging merely the ultimate fact of retaliation is insufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).