Skip to main content
· 9/24/1884

Lumb v. Pinckney

Citations

  • 21 S.C. 471
  • 1884 S.C. LEXIS 119

Syllabus

<p>1. Where a complaint under the betterment act((?<3re. Stat., $$ 1835-1839) alleged a former recovery by defendant against plaintiffs of the land described, the possession by plaintiffs under title which they supposed had conveyed a fee, and the value of improvements erected on this land by plaintiffs, and contained a prayer for a recovery of the value of such improvements, the complaint stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.</p> <p>2. The betterment law of this state {Gen. Stat., $$1835-1839) is notin conflict with sections 1, 14, 21, or 23 of article I. of the constitution of this state, but is a valid and binding enactment of the legislature.</p>

Judges: Chiee, Simpson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.