· 4/14/1999
Luman v. Luman (In Re Luman)
Citations
- 238 B.R. 697
- 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 1086
- 1999 WL 701206
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- When the obligation is not labeled support Calhoun still applies.
- When the obligation is not labeled support Calhoun still applies.
- emphasis 8 It is clear from the Sorah case that Defendant bears the burden of proof on these issues. See Sorah, 163 F.3d at 401-02. And Defendant admits that he has this burden of proof. (E.g., Final Pretrial Order (Docket # 64
- emphasis 8 It is clear from the Sorah case that Defendant bears the burden of proof on these issues. See Sorah, 163 F.3d at 401-02. And Defendant admits that he has this burden of proof. (E.g., Final Pretrial Order (Docket # 64
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richard L. Speer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.