Skip to main content
· 4/14/1999

Luman v. Luman (In Re Luman)

Citations

  • 238 B.R. 697
  • 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 1086
  • 1999 WL 701206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • When the obligation is not labeled support Calhoun still applies.
  • When the obligation is not labeled support Calhoun still applies.
  • emphasis 8 It is clear from the Sorah case that Defendant bears the burden of proof on these issues. See Sorah, 163 F.3d at 401-02. And Defendant admits that he has this burden of proof. (E.g., Final Pretrial Order (Docket # 64
  • emphasis 8 It is clear from the Sorah case that Defendant bears the burden of proof on these issues. See Sorah, 163 F.3d at 401-02. And Defendant admits that he has this burden of proof. (E.g., Final Pretrial Order (Docket # 64

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard L. Speer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.