Fifth Circuit· 12/21/1995
Luken v. Scott
Citations
- 71 F.3d 192
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 36348
- 1995 WL 716942
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “administrative segregation, without more, does not constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally cognizable liberty interest”
- holding that an in mate’s loss of the opportunity to earn future good-time credits does not implicate due process
- holding that “administrative segregation, without more, does not constitute a deprivation 6 of a constitutionally cognizable liberty interest.”
- holding that “administrative segregation, without more, does not constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally cognizable liberty interest”
- holding that “administrative segregation, without more, simply does not constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally cognizable liberty interest”
- holding that “the mere opportunity to earn good-time credits [does not] constitute a constitutionally cognizable liberty interest sufficient to trigger the protection of the Due Process Clause”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Higginbotham, Duhé, Garza
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harper v. ShowersFifth Circuit· 1999-05-24· cited 457×
- Malchi v. ThalerFifth Circuit· 2000-05-23· cited 316×
- Beverati v. SmithFourth Circuit· 1997-08-11· cited 207×
- Hernandez v. VelasquezFifth Circuit· 2008-03-28· cited 177×
- Unnamed caseFifth Circuit· 1997-10-31· cited 100×
- Pichardo v. KinkerFifth Circuit· 1996-01-31· cited 94×
- Abed v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-09-17· cited 93×
- Robert Wilkerson v. Richard StalderFifth Circuit· 2014-12-17· cited 71×
- Paul Eichwedel v. Nedra ChandlerSeventh Circuit· 2012-11-02· cited 60×
- Brown, Ernest v. Plaut, William M.D.C. Circuit· 1997-12-16· cited 58×
- Ralph Abed v. John J. Armstrong, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, State of ConnecticutSecond Circuit· 2000-04-03· cited 53×
- Schevers v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1996-12-17· cited 29×
- Carmouche v. HooperFifth Circuit· 2023-08-10· cited 25×
- Marksberry v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2004-01-30· cited 21×
- Workman v. WilkinsonSixth Circuit· 2001-11-07· cited 18×
- Klein v. CoblentzTenth Circuit· 1997-11-19· cited 15×
- Johnson v. CCA-Northeast Ohio Correctional Center WardenSixth Circuit· 2001-09-14· cited 15×
- Randolph v. CampbellSixth Circuit· 2001-12-06· cited 15×
- Coslett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1997-04-18· cited 12×
- Bruns v. HalfordN.D. Iowa· 1996-01-23· cited 9×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 9,097×
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 3,743×
- Bulger v. United States Bureau of PrisonsFifth Circuit· 1995-09-26· cited 116×
- Rimmer-Bey v. BrownSixth Circuit· 1995-08-09· cited 99×
- Rodriguez v. PhillipsSecond Circuit· 1995-09-15· cited 97×
- Norman GOTCHER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tana WOOD, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1995-10-04· cited 66×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.