Luken v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “administrative segregation, without more, does not constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally cognizable liberty interest”
• holding that an in mate’s loss of the opportunity to earn future good-time credits does not implicate due process
• holding that “administrative segregation, without more, does not constitute a deprivation 6 of a constitutionally cognizable liberty interest.”
• holding that “administrative segregation, without more, does not constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally cognizable liberty interest”
• holding that “administrative segregation, without more, simply does not constitute a deprivation of a constitutionally cognizable liberty interest”
• holding that “the mere opportunity to earn good-time credits [does not] constitute a constitutionally cognizable liberty interest sufficient to trigger the protection of the Due Process Clause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).