Lukacs v. Luton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• examining the statutory definition of stalking under a stalking statute nearly identical to the Mississippi stalking statute at hand, and stating that “by its statutory definition, stalking requires proof of repeated acts”
• “Thus, by its statutory definition, stalking requires proof of repeated acts.”
• “Thus, by its statutory definition, stalking requires proof of repeated acts.”
• “Although the trial court did not base its ruling on the [correct] analysis,” we may affirm where “the facts established below show that appellant committed an act of stalking, and the trial court found appellant committed such an act[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).