Luisa M. Fernandez v. Bankers National Life Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court erred by not ruling on plaintiff’s motion to compel before granting summary judgment
• reviewing a district court’s grant of a motion to reconsider a denial of summary judgment as if it were a Rule 60(b) motion
• reviewing a district court’s grant of a motion to reconsider a denial of summary judgment as if it were a Rule 60(b) motion
• listing Florida appellate and federal district court cases holding that “misrepresentations on an insurance application are material for preventing recovery when the misstatement obviously affects the risk of insurance”
• “Two motions for summary judgment may be ruled upon in the same case . . . .”
• “[T]he district court inap- propriately acted as the trier of fact and erred in granting summary judgment to Bankers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).