Luis Valenzuela RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles D. MARSHALL, Respondent-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that reversible juror misconduct usually relates \directly to a material aspect of the case\ (emphasis added
• stating that reversible juror misconduct usually relates “directly to a material aspect of the case” (emphasis added
• stating that the petitioner “bears the burden of establishing that a constitutional error had a ‘substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury’s verdict.’ ”
• discounting claim of prejudice when extrinsic evidence considered was within the common knowledge of most reasonable jurors
• “Juror misconduct which warrants relief generally relates ‘directly to a material aspect of the case’ ”
• “Juror misconduct which warrants relief generally relates directly to a material aspect of the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).