Skip to main content
· 5/3/1984

Luis Rosario, Inc. v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc.

Citations

  • 733 F.2d 172
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying former exclusive dealer’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief which would require manufacturer to sell to dealer on non-exclusive basis because granting the preliminary injunction would impermissibly rewrite the exclusive dealership agreement
  • district court did not err in considering likely presence or absence’ of just cause in denying injunctive relief
  • the strength of the parties interests may depend on the likelihood that just cause will be found
  • “The strength of the parties’ interests also may depend upon the likelihood that ‘just cause’ will be found.”
  • “under Article 3A the district court need not automatically take ‘probability of success’ into account (citation omitted); but nothing in Article 3A says that it may not ever do so”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Breyer, Hunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.