LUIS ESTEBAN PACHECO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “expert-witness testimony was properly excluded” because “it was not helpful as required by Rule 702”
• noting that Federal Rule of Evidence 403 balancing still applies
• affirming the application of both an abduction enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2A3.1(b)(5) and a physical-restraint enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3A1.3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).