Lufft v. Lufft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[t]he time frame makes this request for a name change look suspiciously like an attempt to anger the appellant”
• explaining that the right to visitation is determined by considering the child’s welfare
• explaining that the right to visitation is determined by considering the child’s welfare
• concluding trial court erred in changing minor child’s surname from the mother’s maiden name to the father’s surname, reasoning the name change was not in the child’s best interest given: (1) the child had never held the father’s surname, (2
• establishing guidelines for court to follow when presented with a change of name request for a minor child under the name change statutes
• establishing guidelines for court to follow when presented with a change of name request for a minor child under the name change statutes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).