Luf v. Town of Southbury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court held impairment of access rights and diminution in total value of property did not constitute an unconstitutional taking
• inverse condemnation damages action available for governmental takings in violation of Article First, § 11 of the Constitution of Connecticut and of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).