E.D. Wisconsin· 1/13/1999
Luedtke v. Bertrand
Citations
- 32 F. Supp. 2d 1074
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 336
- 1999 WL 14243
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “for purposes of §1915(g) and the federal lawsuits it was designed to curtail, the dismissal of a pendant state law claim without prejudice is a non-event and should not factor into the ‘strike’ analysis”
- “for purposes of § 1915(g) and the federal lawsuits it was designed to curtail, the dismissal of a pendant state law claim without prejudice is a non-event and should not factor into the ‘strike’ analysis”
- plaintiff’s “vague allegation of a conspiracy among the defendants to beat, assault, injure, harass and retaliate against him are … insufficient and lack the specificity necessary to show an imminent threat of serious physical injury”
- “To allow a prisoner to get around [§ 1915(g
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Randa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 15,294×
- Ricky Ashley v. E. Dilworth, Co-1, Maximum Security UnitEighth Circuit· 1998-06-19· cited 672×
- John W. Banos v. Michael O'guin, Captain, Jeffery Catoe Richard PillotFifth Circuit· 1998-06-26· cited 390×
- Rivera v. AllinEleventh Circuit· 1998-06-23· cited 361×
- William A. Evans v. Illinois Department of Corrections, Aaron B. Scruggs v. Edward CohnSeventh Circuit· 1998-08-05· cited 166×
- Henry Gibbs, Jr. v. Ms. Marcia Roman, Sci Somerset Librarian, United States of America, IntervenorThird Circuit· 1997-06-06· cited 138×
- Thurman v. GramleySeventh Circuit· 1996-09-23· cited 69×
- Luedtke v. GudmansonE.D. Wisconsin· 1997-07-22· cited 1×
Other cases named Luedtke v. Bertrand
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.