Skip to main content

Ludwig v. Burchill

Citations

  • 514 N.W.2d 674
  • 1994 N.D. LEXIS 77
  • 1994 WL 101336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the trial court did not act in an arbitrary, unreasonable, or unconscionable way when it could consider the best interests of the child without appointing a guardian ad li-tem
  • concluding the trial court did not act in an arbitrary, unreasonable, or unconscionable way when it could consider the best interests of the child without appointing a guardian ad litem
  • considering father’s failure to adjust his work schedule to allow a more stable and consistent relationship with child in deciding change in circumstance warranting change in custody from father
  • nonsubstantive misstatements in a district court decision do not render the court's findings clearly erroneous
  • nonsubstantive misstatements in a district court decision do not render the court’s findings clearly erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Levine, Meschke, Neumann, Sandstrom, Vande, Walle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.