Skip to main content
· 9/26/1991

Ludis J. Cooper v. The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, and the Budd Company, Ludis J. Cooper v. The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company

Citations

  • 945 F.2d 1103
  • 33 Fed. R. Serv. 1531
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7702
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 11886
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22351
  • 1991 WL 188235

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to award a new trial because, among other things, comment was isolated rather than persistent
  • declining to grant a motion for a new trial where “the alleged misconduct occurred only in the argument phase of the trial ... most of counsel’s comments were not objected to at trial and appellants did not move for a mistrial at the end of the argument”
  • declining to grant a motion for a new trial where “the alleged misconduct occurred only in the argument phase of the trial [... ] most of counsel’s comments were not objected to at trial and appellants did not move for a mistrial at the end of the argument”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Pregerson, Trott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.