Skip to main content
· 6/15/1882

Ludeling v. Stubbs

Citations

  • 34 La. 935

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that University of Colorado coach, athletic director, chancellor, and president were “public employees” within meaning of CGIA
  • observing that under Colorado law, nonfeasance cases require the party asserting negligence to establish “that a special relationship exists between the parties such that social policy justifies the imposition of a duty to act” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Poché, Pociié

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.