· 6/15/1882
Ludeling v. Stubbs
Citations
- 34 La. 935
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that University of Colorado coach, athletic director, chancellor, and president were “public employees” within meaning of CGIA
- observing that under Colorado law, nonfeasance cases require the party asserting negligence to establish “that a special relationship exists between the parties such that social policy justifies the imposition of a duty to act” (quotation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Poché, Pociié
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.