Skip to main content
· 6/11/1998

Ludden v. Metro Weekly

Citations

  • 8 F. Supp. 2d 7
  • 47 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1087
  • 26 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2153
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8827
  • 1998 WL 312695

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an advice column and a stage show inspired by that column were sufficiently related for a jury to find that use of a mark in connection with one established priority of use of the mark in connection with the other
  • on summary judgment, the district court found as a legal matter that the title of a newspaper column can be protected as a trademark
  • on summary judgment, the district court found as a legal matter that the title of a newspaper column can be protected as a trademark
  • on summary judgment, the district court found as a legal matter that the title of a newspaper column can be protected as a trademark
  • on summary judgment, the district court found as a legal matter that the title of a newspaper column can be protected as a trademark
  • on summary judgment, the district court found as a legal matter that the title of a newspaper column can be protected as a trademark

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joyce Hens Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.