Ludack v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the acts of sexual molestation pose a greater threat of severe, long-lasting emotional harm” when the perpetrator is someone close to the victim
• explaining that “the acts of sexual molestation pose a greater threat of severe, long-lasting emotional harm” when the perpetrator is someone close to the victim
• holding defendant’s act of child molestation while on parole for rape warranted imposing consecutive sentences
• noting that multiple acts of molestation directed toward the same victim “‘should not be free of consequences.’” 9 (quoting Cardwell v. State, 895 N.E.2d 1219, 1225 (Ind. 2008)). Cf. Ortiz v. State, 766 N.E.2d 370, 377 (Ind. 2002
• affirming 130-year sentence for conviction of two counts of Class A felony Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-2434 | June 28, 2019 Page 29 of 32 child molesting, and habitual offender adjudication, involving one victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).