Lucy J. Emrith v. Tyrone C. James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that damages in an unjust enrichment case properly can be measured by the reasonable value of services provided
• judgment as to breach of contract and upjust enrichment harmless because evidence sufficient to support judgment against defendant for identical damages under either theory
• although ‘‘proof of a contract ordinarily precludes the remedy of unjust enrichment,’’ judgment in favor of the plaintiff on both counts after court trial was harmless error because sufficient evidence was presented to support judgment under either theory
• although “proof of a contract ordinarily precludes the remedy of unjust enrichment,” judgment in favor of the plaintiff on both counts after court trial was harmless error because sufficient evidence was presented to support judgment under either theory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).