Skip to main content

Luckett v. State

Citations

  • 586 S.W.2d 524
  • 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1648

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • identification of stolen property necessary when the only proof of burglary is possession of stolen property
  • identification of stolen property necessary when the only proof of burglary is possession of stolen property
  • Trial court, as finder of fact at the suppression hearing, may choose to believe or disbelieve any or all of the testimony.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Odom, Phillips, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.