Luckes v. County Of Hennepin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that neither the extended duration nor quality of plaintiff’s detention was “conscious-shocking”
• finding, on summary judgment, that a 24-hour detention of a person arrested by warrant for failing to pay traffic fine did not violate due process
• affirming summary judgment for County on detainee’s claim that twenty-four hour booking and processing time at the ADC following arrest violated substantive due process
• affirming the principle but rejecting claim that \inefficiently executed booking and released procedures result[ing] in [plaintiff's] extended detention\ for 24-hours shocked the conscience
• “Because Luckes was named in a valid bench warrant [due to his failure to pay fines] ... probable cause for his arrest pursuant to that warrant was established.”
• “Because Luckes was named in a valid bench warrant, however, probable cause for his arrest pursuant to that warrant was established, and his Fourth Amendment argument is thus without merit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).