· 5/12/1994
Lucker Manufacturing, a Unit of Amclyde Engineered Products, Inc. v. The Home Insurance Company
Citations
- 23 F.3d 808
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10547
- 1994 WL 179135
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding prejudice where the plaintiff’s “actions required the [defendant] to spend its time hounding her for releases the court had already ordered her to provide”
- applying interchangeably laws of the forum state and that of the foreign jurisdiction in resolving the issue of an insurer’s duty to defend and indemnify
- “[T]he decisions of intermediate Pennsylvania appellate courts receive ‘significant weight in the absence of an indication that the highest state court would rule otherwise.’”
- “[T]angible property is property that can be felt or touched, or property capable of being possessed or realized.”
- “Where there is no difference between the laws of the forum state and those of the foreign jurisdiction, there is a ‘false conflict’ and the court need not decide the choice of law issue.”
- “We must construe ambiguous language to provide coverage.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Becker, Roth, Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.