Skip to main content
· 5/12/1994

Lucker Manufacturing, a Unit of Amclyde Engineered Products, Inc. v. The Home Insurance Company

Citations

  • 23 F.3d 808
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10547
  • 1994 WL 179135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding prejudice where the plaintiff’s “actions required the [defendant] to spend its time hounding her for releases the court had already ordered her to provide”
  • applying interchangeably laws of the forum state and that of the foreign jurisdiction in resolving the issue of an insurer’s duty to defend and indemnify
  • “[T]he decisions of intermediate Pennsylvania appellate courts receive ‘significant weight in the absence of an indication that the highest state court would rule otherwise.’”
  • “[T]angible property is property that can be felt or touched, or property capable of being possessed or realized.”
  • “Where there is no difference between the laws of the forum state and those of the foreign jurisdiction, there is a ‘false conflict’ and the court need not decide the choice of law issue.”
  • “We must construe ambiguous language to provide coverage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker, Roth, Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.