Skip to main content
· 12/9/1918

Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.

Citations

  • 248 U.S. 139
  • 39 S. Ct. 53
  • 63 L. Ed. 170
  • 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1701
  • 1 A.L.R. 1522

Syllabus

<p>Where the bills of lading stipulated that the carrier should have the benefit of any insurance that might be effected by the shipper, but the shipper’s policies provided that the insurers should not be liable for merchandise shipped under bills containing such stipulations or in the possession of any carrier who might be liable for its loss or damage, held, that an arrangement between the insurers and the shipper, whereby the former loaned to the latter the amount of a loss caused by the carrier’s negligence, to be repaid only in so far as the shipper recovered from the carrier, otherwise to operate in effect as absolute payment under the'policies, and whereby, as security, the shipper pledged such prospective recovery and .the bills of lading and agreed to prosecute suit against the carrier at the expense and under the exclusive direction and control of the insurers, — was a lawful arrangement; that the loan was not a payment of the insurance and the carrier was not entitled to the benefit of it; and that a libel brought in the shipper’s, name, for the benefit of the insurers, pursuant to the agreement, could be maintained against the carrier and the ship. P. 148. '</p> <p>Liability for unseaworthiness, resting on the personal contract of the shipowner, is not limited by Rev. Stats., § 4283, or the Act of June 26, 1884. P. 149.</p> <p>A time charter characterizing the vessel as “tight, staunch; [and]</p> <p>■ strong,” on delivery, and binding-the owners to “maintain her-in . a thoroughly efficient state in hull and' machineryt for,►and during the service,” imports a warranty, without limitation, of seaworthiness, not merely at delivery, but at the. commencemeht of every' voyage. P. 150.</p> <p>A time charter, like a charter for a single voyage, 4s liot a demise of the ship, and leaves the charterer without' control over her maintenance arid repair, though liable without limitation, to shippers for losses due to unseaworthiness discoverable by the exercise of due

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “a [loan] receipt is a lawful contract which will be enforced”
  • describing the loan-receipt arrangement as “consonant both with the needs of commerce and the demands of justice”
  • rejecting the argument that an insurance company’s “loan” to an insured operated as a payment
  • upholding validity of loan receipt agreement between insurer and insured
  • in which Justice Brandéis, discussing loan receipts, says: “It is creditable to the ingenuity of business men that an arrangement should have been devised which is consonant both with the needs of commerce and the demands of justice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brandeis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.