Luckart v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “AS 12.55.175(c) gives the three-judge panel the authority to expand a defendant’s eligibility for discretionaryparole unless that authority is restricted by some other statutory provision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Adrian T. Olmstead v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2020-11-06· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Juneby v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-03-11· cited 147×
• Lacquement v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-04-22· cited 61×
• Kirby v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1987-12-31· cited 26×
• Reyes v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1999-04-30· cited 21×
• Peetook v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-12-03· cited 20×
• Garner v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2012-01-05· cited 6×
• XEUY SIKEO v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2011-07-01· cited 5×
• Luckart v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2012-01-27· cited 5×
• Kimbrell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-07-09· cited 3×
• State v. Ridgway
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1988-02-26· cited 2×