Skip to main content
· 5/24/1978

Lucille E. ROHLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRW, INC., William N. Lesley and Ralph M. Lehman, Defendants-Appellees

Citations

  • 576 F.2d 1260
  • 25 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 581
  • 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11012
  • 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8329
  • 20 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The permission to amend a complaint should be refused only if it appears to a certainty that the plaintiff cannot state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”
  • plaintiff mistakenly relied on 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for her claims of sex and age discrimination; district court should have permitted plaintiff to correct that allegation to refer to Title VII and the ADEA and to allege requisite exhaustion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fairchild, Reynolds, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.