Luciano Pisoni Fabbrica Accessori Instrumenti Musicali and Enzo Pizzi, Inc. v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Commerce’s position was substantially justified in part because of “complexity, uniqueness, and newness” of issues
• finding the government’s position was substantially justified where the government “did not persist in pressing a tenuous factual or legal position”
• underlying case revoked anti-dumping duty order, but Commerce’s position substantially justified in part because of “complexity, uniqueness, and newness” of issues
• though anti-dumping order revoked, Commerce’s determination was substantially justified because of “complexity, uniqueness, and newness” of issues
• “[w]hen the court said Commerce’s merchandise comparison methodology was ‘unreasonable,’ it was using a shorthand word for unsupported by substantial evidence on the record”
• “The mere fact that the United States lost the case does not show that its position in defending the case was not substantially justified.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).