Lucey v. Hero International Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that \`[a]n agreement to enter into a contract which leaves the terms of that contract for future negotiation is too indefinite to be enforced'\
• holding that plaintiff had burden of showing that president of corporation had authority to enter into an option agreement on behalf of the corporation or that the corporation ratified it with full knowledge of its provisions
• finding that “ ‘[a]n agreement to enter into a contract which leaves the terms of that contract for future negotiation is too indefinite to be enforced’ ”
• finding that \'[a]n agreement to enter into a contract which leaves the terms of that contract for future negotiation is too indefinite to be enforced'\
• an agreement to enter into a contract which leaves the terms of that contract for future negotiations is too indefinite to be enforced
• “An agreement to enter into a contract which leaves the terms of the contract for future negotiation is too indefinite to be enforced.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).