Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 4/10/1972

Lucey v. Hero International Corp.

Citations

281 N.E.2d 266
361 Mass. 569
1972 Mass. LEXIS 927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that \`[a]n agreement to enter into a contract which leaves the terms of that contract for future negotiation is too indefinite to be enforced'\
holding that plaintiff had burden of showing that president of corporation had authority to enter into an option agreement on behalf of the corporation or that the corporation ratified it with full knowledge of its provisions
finding that “ ‘[a]n agreement to enter into a contract which leaves the terms of that contract for future negotiation is too indefinite to be enforced’ ”
finding that \'[a]n agreement to enter into a contract which leaves the terms of that contract for future negotiation is too indefinite to be enforced'\
an agreement to enter into a contract which leaves the terms of that contract for future negotiations is too indefinite to be enforced
“An agreement to enter into a contract which leaves the terms of the contract for future negotiation is too indefinite to be enforced.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro, Cutter, Quirico, Hennessey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.