· 10/8/1951
Lucero v. Saindon
Citations
- 342 U.S. 824
- 72 S. Ct. 43
- 96 L. Ed. 623
- 1951 U.S. LEXIS 1607
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where the court found no genuine issue of material fact of substantive unconscionability, it never reached the question of procedural unconscionability, but upheld the district court’s summary judgment dismissing the unconscionability claim
- right to jury trial waived where request filed the day before the scheduled trial
- “[W]e must decide at what point ... the pleadings finally framed the various issues to be put before the trier-of-fact; that is, when did the pleadings cease raising new factual issues and begin simply alleging new legal theories or particularized facts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.