Lucero-Nelson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that WMATA is not subject to claims under the D.C. Human Rights Act
• finding the plaintiff’s “fail[ure] to cite any statute that expressly awards punitive damages against WMATA . . . fatal to [her] position”
• denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment because plaintiff’s injuries were not compensable under the WCA
• denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment because plaintiff’s injuries were not compensable under the WCA
• applying Underwood to deny employer's request for summary judgment on the emotional distress claims that accompanied the employee's Title VII and Human Rights Act sexual harassment claims
• noting that “extraordinary circumstances” exception is “narrowly construed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).