Lucenti v. Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Courts must strictly adhere to [Title VU’s] procedural requirements for gaining access to the federal courts.”
• “[H]ostile work environment and retaliation claims under Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act properly are addressed under the same standard.”
• “Allegations of even constant reprimands and work criticism by themselves are not sufficient to establish a hostile environment claim.”
• “Reprimands, threats of disciplinary action, and excessive scrutiny do not constitute adverse employment actions.”
• “Reprimands, threats of disciplinary action, and excessive scrutiny do not constitute adverse employment actions.”
• “Reprimands, threats of disciplinary action, and excessive scrutiny do not constitute adverse employment actions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).