· 5/3/2000
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Lucentsucks. Com
Citations
- 95 F. Supp. 2d 528
- 54 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1653
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6159
- 2000 WL 554567
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a successful showing that a website is one for critical commentary can “seriously undermine” the requisite elements in an ACPA claim
- dismissing an in rem ACPA case after the plaintiff located the U.S.-based registrant five days after suing
- dismissing an in rem ACPA case after the plaintiff located the U.S.-based registrant five days after suing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brinkema
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.