· 9/6/1990
Lucchesi v. State
Citations
- 807 P.2d 1185
- 14 Brief Times Rptr. 1140
- 1990 Colo. App. LEXIS 281
- 1990 WL 128010
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Colorado speech and debate clause must be “interpreted to provide an absolute immunity for all actions naturally involved in the performance of any legislative functions”
- holding that administrative agencies have no jurisdiction to pass on constitutional challenges to statutes which it administers and that such issues must be raised before a district court in a declaratory judgment action
- holding that the Colorado speech and debate clause must be “interpreted to provide an absolute immunity for all actions naturally involved in the performance of any legislative functions”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Criswell, Davidson, Dubofsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.