Skip to main content
· 9/6/1990

Lucchesi v. State

Citations

  • 807 P.2d 1185
  • 14 Brief Times Rptr. 1140
  • 1990 Colo. App. LEXIS 281
  • 1990 WL 128010

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Colorado speech and debate clause must be “interpreted to provide an absolute immunity for all actions naturally involved in the performance of any legislative functions”
  • holding that administrative agencies have no jurisdiction to pass on constitutional challenges to statutes which it administers and that such issues must be raised before a district court in a declaratory judgment action
  • holding that the Colorado speech and debate clause must be “interpreted to provide an absolute immunity for all actions naturally involved in the performance of any legislative functions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Criswell, Davidson, Dubofsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.