Lucas Wall v. Lucinda Barbers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying plaintiff’s due process challenge where “there were no contested facts that needed to be resolved at a past-deprivation hearing”
• rejecting due process challenge to District’s refusal to provide a hearing on driver’s license renewal where “there were no contested facts that needed to be resolved at a post-deprivation hearing”
• pertaining to a DMV decision declining to renew a non-commercial driver’s license

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).