Skip to main content
· 11/3/1930

Lucas v. United States ex rel. Blackstone Mfg. Co.

Citations

  • 45 F.2d 291
  • 59 App. D.C. 389

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ordering both parents to contribute to children’s school tui- tion because it was “required to meet the children’s needs”
  • ordering both parents to contribute to children’s school tuition because it was “required to meet the children’s needs”
  • “Our review is for ‘any evidence’ to support the trial court’s finding that husband acted willfully [in failing to perform obligations under the dissolution judgment].”
  • \Our review is for `any evidence' to support the trial court's finding that husband acted willfully [in failing to perform obligations under the dissolution judgment].\
  • wife’s homemaking contribution, which included raising the parties’ children and contributing her salary, was “substantial”
  • even though neither party made substantial, targeted contribution to marital appreciation in subject property, wife’s uncompensated contributions as homemaker and caregiver for parties’ children preserved presumption that she contributed equally to that appreciation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Robb, Supreme, Ustiee, Wheat

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.