Lucas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prejudicial question violated motion in limine and asserted extraneous offense as fact
• prejudicial question violated motion in limine and asserted extraneous offense as fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Harnett v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-11-16· cited 186×
• Reyes v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-11-04· cited 94×
• Landers v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-07-02· cited 38×
• Tomlinson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1967-11-22· cited 29×
• Tate v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1988-11-23· cited 17×
• Scruggs v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1989-04-20· cited 16×
• State v. Milton
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-08-21· cited 10×
• Bell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1968-11-06· cited 5×
• Lopez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1982-11-03· cited 4×
• Charles Scott Harnett v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-11-16
• Corwyn Lamar McGinnis v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-05-17
• Clarence Don Hunter v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2006-11-16
• Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 1979-07-02

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pitcock v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-06-10· cited 14×
• Wadley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1957-10-30· cited 3×