Lucas v. Paige

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to find a pretext for age discrimination in the hiring panel’s “ultimate[] conclusion] that the interviewees’ educational levels were not as important as their answers to the interview questions”
• finding a workplace remark to be evidence of discrimination where the statement “was made by an individual with the power to influence Plaintiff’s termination, and the remark was temporally close in time to the termination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).