Lucas v. Nesbitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence was insufficient to support finding that attorney's conduct in billing client four times the amount he testified to under oath constituted a deceptive trade practice
• evidence was insufficient to support finding that attorney's conduct in billing client four times the amount he testified to under oath constituted a deceptive trade practice
• deceptive trade practices act applies to lawyers, but no evidence that conduct in question violated the act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).