Lucas v. Lucas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• public policy will not allow a spendthrift trust beneficiary to be well taken care of when those who he has a legal duty to support must do without such support
• it is against public policy to allow a beneficiary of spendthrift trust to be well taken care of when those who have every right to look to him for support are doing without

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jay Fikes and Associates v. Walton
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1979-02-26· cited 57×
• Krug v. Krug
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1992-01-24· cited 45×
• Guntert v. City of Stockton
  California Court of Appeal· 1974-11-18· cited 39×
• Bacardi v. White
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-01-31· cited 27×
• North Side Bank v. Wachendorfer
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1979-06-21· cited 23×
• Fisher v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1968-01-31· cited 23×
• White v. Bacardi
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-01-24· cited 6×
• Havens v. Lee
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1984-07-13· cited 2×
• Panamerican Operating, Inc. v. George Land & Cattle Co., LLC
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2014-08-25
• Klepak v. Klepak
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1967-06-16

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Rubion
  Texas Supreme Court· 1957-12-04· cited 48×
• First Nat. Bank of Beaumont v. Howard
  Texas Supreme Court· 1950-05-10· cited 19×
• Fannie Seidenberg v. Martha E. Seidenberg
  D.C. Circuit· 1955-06-30· cited 15×
• McDonald v. Alvis
  Texas Supreme Court· 1955-07-20· cited 12×
• Seidenberg v. Seidenberg
  District of Columbia· 1954-12-01· cited 9×