Lucas v. Kriska

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Illinois law presumes the tameness and docility of dogs and only imposes liability where there is notice of the dog’s vicious propensities.”
• \Illinois law presumes the tameness and docility of dogs and only imposes liability where there is notice of the dog's vicious propensities\
• \Illinois law presumes the tameness and docility of dogs and only imposes liability where there is notice of the dog's vicious propensities.\
• the trial court erred in not granting judgment notwithstanding the verdict in light of the complete absence of evidence of prior bites by the dog
• the trial court erred in not granting judgment notwithstanding the verdict in light of the complete absence of evidence of prior bites by the dog
• the trial court erred in not granting judgment notwithstanding the verdict in light of the complete absence of evidence of prior bites by the dog

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).