Lucas v. Gund, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “while it may have been unfair to have 23 [Plaintiff] sign an agreement refencing rules which were not attached at the time, it would only 24 render the agreement unenforceable if those rules were substantively unconscionable”
• “The [AAA] rules do 26 not limit discovery other than to provide that only ‘necessary’ discovery shall be conducted, but this 27 is the same standard as applies in court: parties at trial cannot engage in unfettered discovery.”
• noting same rule applicable in 2006

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).