Skip to main content
· 12/26/2001

Lucas Automotive Engineering, Inc. v. Bridgestone/firestone, Inc., and Coker Tire Company

Citations

  • 275 F.3d 762
  • 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10616
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 13309
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 27188
  • 2001 WL 1654565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing summary judgment on the basis of a genuine issue of material fact regarding market definition
  • reversing order granting summary judgment because there was 19 a genuine issue of material fact regarding market definition
  • finding the district court 23 did not err in imposing sanctions for unintentional failure to attend mediation session
  • affirming a district 21 court’s imposition of sanctions on a party for failure to attend a pretrial mediation 22 session
  • affirming sanctions under 24 Rule 16 for party representative’s unintentional failure to attend mediation session
  • upholding district court’s Rule 16 sanctions where the plaintiff’s representative failed to attend mediation because he was suffering from an “incapacitating headache” and did not notify the parties beforehand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chever, Silverman, George

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.